I packed my bag and in I put ....(5)

When I started planning this walk I had no idea about complicated all the stuff on gear is. There is a whole universe of innovators out there creating things to meet needs I didn’t even know I had and I think I’m just skimming the surface. One thing I did know was that carrying loads of stuff is not good news and on the treks I’ve done already I learnt how to travel light. What I didn’t know was that cutting things down is almost a “movement”, generates a huge amount of discussion and drives innovation and design for products most walkers and hikers, relying on shops in the high street, will not be aware of.  There are lots of really interesting things to get my teeth into, not just the footwear, but for every item there are light weight choices to be made. Good fun.

The thing which is giving me most grief is all the electronics stuff. I’m going on a long walk, I want to plan it, find my way, record it and ideally communicate as much of it as possible as I do it. I’ve got a number of problems. Firstly some of this stuff is expensive and I don’t like spending money. Secondly it’s complicated particularly the GPS stuff, not just the products but the maps (particularly as I’m planning to travel across six countries). Thirdly I haven’t used some of this stuff before, particularly GPS, and so don’t really know what I’m talking about. Fourthly it could end being heavy particularly if I can’t come up with some solution to keep all this stuff powered up. The electronics stuff is not such good fun.

There is a debate going on out there as to whether the smart phone is the whizzo bang device I talked about in my second bag packing blog – well it could be but it all depends on how precious you are about particular requirements and how willing you are to make do. At the moment, and I’m still working this out (requirements pushing me – meanness holding me back) but it looks like I need lots of devices – acknowledging this is progress of a kind and it looks like I might even have an answer to the recharging dilemma multiple devices present.


Device 1 - GPS

The thing I’m struggling with is the paper maps. Asked the question of Lighthiker and he rightly points out that walking the E4 is not bush whacking – most of it is along high profile and well marked national trails. If I had paper maps than I could use these in conjunction with the GPS on an IPhone for any navigation.

On the other hand if I had a high spec GPS wouldn’t this allow me to do all the route planning in advance and generate the paper maps. Starting with paper maps rather than digital maps you don’t get the same route planning functionality and if you could plot your route and print it via the GPS route planning software aren’t you getting the best of both worlds?

I’m looking at the different GPS devices and the SatMap Active 10 Active 10 looks particularly good. Although it’s the heaviest of all completing devices its new European service is impressive especially what looks like a partnership with the  German and Austrian Alpine Associations (Austrian mapping is proving a nightmare – more of that in my next blog). I’m also trying to understand the offer from Compe-GPS which also appears to have a European mapping service and supports both a standalone product and an Iphone product.

Device 2 - Netbook

The debate on this is whether I go for an iPad or not. Against it is expense, the lack of a keyboard and the fact that the OS system at the moment is not multi-tasking. In favour is its weight and exploding functionality. Had a go with my sister’s iPad and was very impressed and I think the on-screen key board will be fine and by the time I’m ready go it might have the same multi-tasking software Apple use on the latest iPhone.


Device 3 - Camera

I want to take half decent camera. At the moment I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 which is getting a bit old and bashed but is still far better than any phone based camera I have come across - it has a zoom lens for one thing. I might treat myself to the latest version, the Panasonic Lumix TZ10  ;which use GPS to geotag photographs – very handy.

Device 4 - Phone

I’m ashamed to say but I have never bought a phone - I have always had one through work. I now need to get one and it’s a bit of an intellectual challenge (seems to be a bit of a theme developing). The key consideration is what am I going to use it for in particular the extent to which I use it for GPS. If I go with a an iPad, than the iPhone probably makes sense in which case I wouldn’t need to take an iPod for music.

Device 5 - GPS Locator

I am interested something like the Spot personal tracker. It could be interesting for people to see if I’m still moving, tracking progress, and indeed has some safety benefits.

So I’m definitely in the nightmare world of lots of different devices all with different power stores and different recharging requirements. Thanks to Chris and Matt Aloise, who left a comment on the blog, I now have a better understanding of both the issues and opportunities associated with the world of power generation, storage and recharging (particularly the fact that some products have an internal recharging capability and some don’t). They also introduced me to a range of products from Me2Solar which I think could provide the solutions.

I think I have two key requirements - firstly to get rid of as many of the specialist recharging devices as possible and secondly to provide some power resiliance for the critical devices. In reality I only have one critical device and that’s the GPS - it’s also - compared to the others - energy hungry. What the Me2Solar range of products does is provide an intermediary store for energy - a larger battery - which can then be used to charge all the other devices (the Arigo); a universal power charger where devices don’t have an internal recharging capability (Pixo C2 plus); and a means of generating power through a light portable solar panel (the Aurora Pro 25).

So progress of a kind although the decision of the key piece of electronic kit, the GPS, is still to be made. What I think I will do is get myself a iPhone and start to understand how far that will take me and, at the same time, get a better understanding of what I can achieve through the Satmap and Comp-GPS mapping services.

Stage 13 - Switzerland

You could blame Switzerland for my E4 adventure.  The first time I did place to place unassisted walking was about 10 years ago, with Christine, when we went from Grindelwald to Gstaad and my enthusiasm for this style of walking has grown ever since.  Of course we were completely spoilt by the scenery, particularly the awesome views of the Eiger and the Jungfrau, but it was the excitement of a new walk everyday and the sense of achievement from looking back over ground covered that really got me hooked.

Switzerland really is a different country.  Intensely associated with the Alps (almost interchangeable) it has lots things going for it.  Famous for its long history of independence and neutrality it somehow combines an intensely decentralised form of government (all the way down to referendum) with really strong national institutions (a  conscript army based on national service).  Famous of course for its financial services (infamous to some (particularly Harold Wilson)) it actually has a broadly based economy with the highest per capita level of manufacturing in Europe (interesting counter factual - it also has the lowest proportion of graduates in its workforce).  Switzerland is a successful country and all this makes for easy hassle free visiting.

As it happens the E4 route through Switzerland does not take you through classic Alpine scenary (that comes in buckets in Austria) but through the less well known Jura Mountains and then along the southern shore of Lake Constance.

Through the Jura the route follows the Jura Crest Way (also known as the Jura Ridgeway or the Jura Hoehenwege in German).  The Crest Way is one of the oldest national trails in the world with original development starting in 1905.  It starts at Nyon, just north of Geneva, and finishes at Dielsdorf, just north of Zurich, joining up Switzerland's two largest cities.  As the name suggests the route follows an east west ridge overlooking the central plateau with its huge lakes with the Alps forming the horizon to the south.  The views should be amazing.

The walk along the southern edge Lake Constance (Bodansee in German) will be the first sustained bit of flat walking since the Costa Dorada and I should be arriving there at the perfect time for some lake swimming.

There are two really good sources for developing the itinerary.  The Swiss Hiking Federation website provides both an itinerary and a description of the stages and a site called Activity Workshop provides a KMZ file for the route which you can display in Google Earth (for the Jura Crest Way).  The KMZ file, by the way, seems to confirm the Google Earth effect and shortens the route.  The Jura Crest Way is said everywhere to be 310 kms long but it comes out in Google Earth at 270 - will need to keep that in mind when looking again at my proposed itinerary in France which was very Google Earth dependant.

Both itineraries are different and both go from west to east rather than east to west.  They are also designed to let travellers get to the start of each day on a bus and are less concerned about accommodation.  Consequently I've done my own which is both faster (worryingly) and assumes that I want to stay as near the trail as possible.  The net effect is that I plan to cross Switzerland in 16 days (see attached itinerary).

I've done my own estimates for how long each day's walking will take based on Naismith's rule with Tranters corrections and a neat calculator from Wotz Wot.  I've included the optional assumption that walking downhill (gently) covers more distance than on the flat and that by the time I get to Switzerland I will be somewhere between fit and very fit.  Both assumptions could be optimistic but it stays light for a long time in July!

There are no really large towns along the route until you get to Konstance, which looks like a good place for a stop-over (the other towns/villages don't look that inspiring).  My itinerary does have a couple of long days,  probably too long (Day 6 and 10), but both are driven by accommodation constraints and the desire to stay as close to the trail rather than just masochism.  You could easily break up the other long day, Day 10.

Rather than a day by day description I have grabbed some images (mainly from the Activity Workshop site) which give a taste as to what I can expect - looks great



Down to Geneva from Mont Dole



Highest Point Mont Tendre
The Alps from Vue des Alps


Limestone Cliffs at Creux de Van


The E4 through France

This is a rewrite of the blog I did a couple of months ago and benefits from the work I have now done on the French part of the E4 itinerary and the more detailed planning I have completed for each stage.

The route is more complex than the E4 in Spain which largely followed the route of the Spanish GR 7.  In France the route joins up sections of 9 different GR routes. When it comes to developing the itinerary some things are easier and some more difficult compared to Spain. In England, French maps are much easier to get hold of, particularly if you live in London, and indeed I found I already had a number of them from previous trips. The Federation Francaise de la Randonnee Pedestre, the national walking association, have been particularly helpful. Not only did they provide me (free of charge) with a map of Europe with all the E routes marked, they also constructed a table for me listing all the maps I would need to get. Brilliant, formidable or what!

What I haven't been able to find (yet) are the itineraries you get on the Spanish regional walking associations websites which give you a stage breakdown with estimates of how long it will take you to complete each stage. What I have found, as a substitute, is a site called GR-info which not only lists all the GR routes but allows you to display them on Google Earth. Using Google Earth you can then work out where the accommodation is and produce distance and amount of climb - almost all you need to plan an itinerary.

According to the GR-info/Google Earth method the E4 in France is 1186 kms long. This is 86 kms longer than the figure on ERA website.  Not sure which, if either, number is right and to be honest I think the GR-info/Google Earth method straightens a lot of bendy lines and could itself understate the real extent of the route.

My itinerary suggests I could complete the route in 46 days - which translates into 26 kms or 15.5 miles a day. This looks OK but could be a bit more of a stretch when you start to take account of the ups and down. Roughly speaking it’s 49km up and not surprisingly and about the same amount down.

The route is very varied from virtually every perspective. It’s varied in terms of the walking itself, going from quite gentle, once your out of the Pyrenees and heading towards and beyond Carcassone, to really very tough, as you get into the Vercors and the foothills of the Alps. It’s varied in terms of the history and the mark history has made on the architecture of the towns (I’m particularly looking forward to those Cathar castles in the south-east). It’s also varied in terms of the geography, geology and to an extent climate as to travel from Alpine to Mediterranean and back to Alpine again. This is top walking country and French have celebrated this with a necklace of national and regional parks which almost join the entire route together.

Accommodation by and large looks plentiful and I shouldn’t need a tent or even a bivi bag.  A number of the stopovers however involve a "Gite d'Etape" . The definition of what you get in a “Gite d’Etape” is not entirely clear, not to me anyway, and while some definitely come with half board others don’t which will mean carrying  food for more than one day.

There are options for breaking up the route and at the moment I’m thinking of stopping for a day a Carcassonne, Villefort, Malaucene and Grenoble, 4 days rest, 46 days walking, which might not be enough. Anyway if I leave it time being that France will take  50 days, start France on the 14th May I should be ready for the Swiss section by the 2nd of July. Onwards and upwards!

Stage 12 - Grenoble to the Swiss Border

Getting to the Swiss border, where the E4 turns firmly east, involves a journey of some 245 kms, 10,500 metres of climb and 9110 of descent.  The planned schedule involves 9 days of walking.  Coming up with a plan for the route has proved more difficult than the other French stages as accommodation seems to be more limited.   At the moment there are a couple of days which, because of the lack of accommodation, look too long.

North of Grenoble from La Bastille
You can break the walk down into three parts - a really dramatic, and tough, first three days through the Chartreuse Natural Park; a gentler central stage which eventually takes across the Rhone (for the second time, with the Rhone now flowing east to west and out of Lake Geneva); and finally an upland section the last couple of days of which are in the Haut Jura Natural Park.

The Chartreuse Natural Park is built around the Chartreuse Massif which is the mirror image of the Vercors and shares the same dramatic limestone scenery.  Grenoble sits strategically in the gap between the two.

The walk takes you through the Rhone Alps region and (I think) the departments of Isere, Savoie and Ain.  After Grenoble you don't visit any significant towns which partly explains the sparse accommodation.

Grenoble, the start point, is the second largest city on the E4 route (I'm saying that Budapest is on the route) and I guess I will spend at least a day there (recovering from the tough last three days of the Vercours route).  There is lots to see.  One of the main sites is La Bastille, a huge fortification which sits above the town.  The E4 route takes you close and then above La Bastille on the first day.

After a rest the day one walk will be a sharp wake up call involving an all day climb up into the Chartreuse from Grenoble.  The views should be great.  In addition to the climb, the challenge is to find some accommodation on the route which makes it possible to avoid an extra climb the next day.  It probably makes sense to stop at Sappey-en-Chartreuse after a 13 km walk from Grenoble and a climb of 1250 metres and a descent of 600 metres.

Day 2 over Dome de Bellafont
Day 2 at the moment is a bit of a problem.  The first accommodation I have been able to find on the route is 27 kilometres from Sappey-en-Chartreuse (at La Plagne) and because that looks very limited it probably makes sense to go a bit further onto Entremont Le Vieux.  Climbing 1700 metres and walking 30 kms is getting close to a 13/14 hour walk - not good - but at the moment it is the only option I have come up with.

At least day 3 is more straightforward.  The target is Les Eschelles, a 20 km walk involving 600 metres of descent and a village at the end of it with accommodation.

Although the E4 has now dropped out of the high Chartreuse accommodation on the route is still scarce.  As a consequence the day 4 plan, like day 2, looks too long.  The target is Gite d'Etape near St Maurice de Rotherens (doesn't look like it does food), a walk of 29 kms with 1300 metres of climb and 900 metres of descent.  Looks a nice walk, particularly the ridge walk towards the end which promises views across the plain to Lyons.

Next day, day 5, your into the valley proper descending 800 metres down to the banks of Rhone, tracking and then eventually crossing it just before you get to the day's destination Culoz.  Culoz is a small market town with a population of 2,600 people (plenty of accommodation).  Culoz's most famous feature is the Grand Columbier, a mountain which towers above it and which has to be climbed the next day.  Grand Columbier is a famous Tour de France hill climb.
Grand Columbier

As well as having to climb Grand Columbier, day 6 is also challenging terms of accommodation.  There are two options so far: the first is a Gite d'Etape near Brenaz (after 18 kms and a climb of 1500 metres); and the second is a Gite d'Etape near Les Bergonnes (29 kms and a climb of 1770 metres - almost certainly too far).  I don't think there is food at either stop-over.

Depending on which option I end up with (the first almost certainly) - next day's walk is the small village of Saint-Germain de Joux (where there is definitely accommodation).  The walk will either be 33 km (600 metres climb and 1300 descent) or a 20 km walk (270 metres climb and 960 drop) - both feasible.

Pressing on with with the mad rush to the Swiss border (thoughts of Steve McQueen on a motor bike in the Great Escape) the plan for day 8 is a 30 km walk up out of the valley of Saint German-de-Roux, through a series of small settlements (Marnod, Giron) and fairly densely wooded countryside, before dropping down to the small village of Lelex.  If 30 kms and 1200 metres of climb is too far I could call it a day after 20 kms at Le Berbois.

There are options for day 9.  I could either do a short  8 km walk to the Col de la Faucille, (with 1000 metres of climb) or put in a big shift and carry on for another 25 kms to Saint-Cergue at the start of the Swiss section of walk.  Both places have accommodation but although Saint-Cergue has more (not a lot more).  At the moment I'm planning to go all the way into Switzerland but either way it would great to find somewhere nice to stop, recuperate and reflect on what will have been an epic journey through France

Nordalpine Weitwanderweg 01 - Test Run Report Back

The Nordapline Wietwanderweg 01 (NW 01 for short) is the toughest part of the E4 route.  It's an important planning consideration, for the whole project, to know, both, whether I'm capable of walking it, and have enough time to complete it before it snows.  So, with my wife Christine, we planned an 8 day test which started on the shore of Lake Constance on the 9th of July.

The first thing to say is that we may have been very lucky with the weather.  My experience of walking in the Alps is that the weather is more reliable than the UK, but for the test run it was near perfect.  Also spring arrived late this year and the flowers came both late and at once - this meant that we saw "everything" from meadows full of orchids, gentians and globeflowers, and all colours, with all shades of purple, blue and yellow.

The second thing to say is that all the planned stops were "pre-programmed" (booked) and the programming had been based on the projected time needed to walk from one hutte to the next.  The timings were provided by the hutte web sites (and used on all the signs in Austria).  We were carrying our stuff but travelling light.

Stayed in Bregenz on the Friday night before the walk having arrived after a flight to Zurich and a series of train journeys. The Swiss train service is brilliant, and our ticket included an itinerary with both the changes and the platforms involved. Bregenz is a nice place with an amazing open air opera where staging takes place in, yes in, Lake Constance.  We spent the afternoon lake swimming  - almost like a normal holiday.
My first mistake was to plan the end of Day 1 and not the start.   By and large, I don't think you need to book the huttes, particularly in early July, but we were desperate get our own rooms to avoid dormitories.  I had booked the Freschenhaus, just to south of the Hoher Freschen, but had not worked  where to start in order to get there at a sensible time.  We guessed at this in a taxi out of Bregenz, so not a lot science, and chose a point on the NW 01 east of Dornbirn and west of Bodele.  The route looked about 18 kms long and involved a climb of about 1400 metres.  The first clue as to the likely duration came at the Lustenaur Hutte (11-30)  which said 6.5 hours to Hoher Freschen.  We had already been walking for 2 hours so this meant a long first day but not a disaster.  Trouble was we had no real idea about a "standard walking hour" - could you stop to rest and how fast do you have to go to keep up.

The slightly worrying thing is that the next hours revealed my ability to ignore the all evidence.   Despite a map, and despite knowing where I was, I still thought that the peak in the reasonably located middle distance was the Hoher Freschen ignoring the evidence said  it was further away.

How far?
At about 5 we climbed my version of the Hoher Freschen which was, in fact, the Morzelspitze.  Nice mountain, great views, but not the Hoher Freschen.  Worst still is that we didn't even need to go up it but, at the top, the grim reality of where had to get to - the real Hoher Freschen - was clearly visible, looked huge and a long way away. At 6 we got to Altenhofaple and got some water from two students milking cows by hand and seriously considered staying there.  The signs were telling us another 2 hours to Hoher Freschen.  After running on empty, however, we started to revive and at 7.30 were at the foot of right mountain and at its top just after 8.

Stepping carefully up to Hoher Freschen
On the way up, very near the top, we discovered what the ladder symbol on the map means.  It doesn't mean a ladder - it's more an official symbol for scary - fixed ropes, narrows ledges, big drops and scary - and at the end of a long 10 hour walking day.
After that, 15 minutes or so to the hutte, nice dinner, a host dressed like Roy Orbison but not such a good singer (did an interesting over the top German version of an REM song), cold water wash and bed.

Day 2

Not a brilliant nights sleep and woke up unable to find my camera.  Went through all the pockets in my back-pack, checked with Roy Orbison, even walked back up to the top of Hoher Freschen, but no luck.  Set of to Damuls fed up but determined not to let incompetence ruin the trip.  The route was brilliant, three hours where the path sticks limpet like to the contour refusing to give or take a metre of climb or fall.  Great scenery but no pictures.  Eventually climbed over a small arrete and then dropped down to the Partaaple Hutte, ordered a banana milkshake, and with a small cloud appearing on the horizon dived into the rucksack for my waterproofs.  Found my camera.  An incompetent incompetent.

The rest of the route down into Damuls was not so nice, down amongst the trees again and very hot.  Christine started to wilt and we stopped at a farmhouse offering snacks.  No one there but the woman in charge.  Christine ordered a cheese sandwich and I asked for ham.  What we got was two platters with wonderfully arranged home grown produce.  By the time we left the place was packed.

Arrived in Damuls to discover the place I had booked was out of town and a mile of the route.  Christine goes on strike but after a stand-off in the sun (sitting on opposite sides of road incommunicado) she rings the hotel, tells them her husband is an idiot and can't read a map and would they mind if we cancelled.  They didn't and we book into a nice hotel in the middle of town where the waitresses wore Austrian national costumes.  Lovely room, a bath - good result Christine.

Day 3

Fueled up from good food (watched the world cup final and an enormous thunder storm) we set of at about 8-30 for Biberache Hutte.  Everything fresh and clear after the rain and after a 40 minute walk to Faschina (where we should have stayed) we start the walk proper.  After a steady 300 metre climb in the shade of the Zafernhorne we cross a col at Furka (1900 metres).  Suddenly, in bright sunshine,we get a brand new vista.  Immediately in front of us is an amphitheatre with a path outlined on the middle terrace.  In the distance, forming the horizon, is the jagged profile of the Zitterklapfen, which we know we have to cross.

Zitterklapfen on the horizon
Having completed the terrace walk, crossed a small ridge, we walk through a sea of yellow flowers - could have been Globeflowers or Mountain Avons - down to an ancient farmhouse where we meet our first walker of the day, a woman in her seventies with an enormous stick.  She points out the path up to the Hechschere Pass.

Marching across a meadow below Hechschere
Clinging on at the top of Hochshere
To be honest I'm not sure what it means to be an experienced alpine walker (the qualification for the NW 01) but the last fifteen minutes to the top of the Hechschere Pass, and the first fifteen coming down were the scariest 30 minutes walking I have done.  Lots of steel ropes, lots of narrow paths, and lots of loose scree all hanging above bone crushing, deadly drops.  The views from the top were great, another new vista, including the even higher mountains we would be crossing in the next few days.  However the fear associated with the climb, and the anticipation of the descent, meant that we didn't savour either the view (or our second helping of bread and liver sausage) as much as we should have done.  We did, of course, get down but neither of us would relish doing it again.

The rest of the walk was pretty tough, high up on the side of the valley  underneath the Zitteklapfen.  Just as you started to relax, the route would take you across a landslip and the path became treachourous again.  Our nerves were further stretched by some aggressive cows, less submissive than their UK sisters, who were keen to chase us off their mountain.  Stopped to chat with a couple of walkers who asked us which way we had come and their sharp intake of breadth when we said the Hochshere Pass made us feel a lot better.
Look no path

Biberache Hutte
Arrived at the Biberache Hutte at about 6, 10 hours since leaving Damuls.  It was lovely, great landlady, great food, great beer, our own room and a shower (cold).  Made friends with a German baker and his teenage son who were doing a new circular route, the Lechquellon Runde, which coincided with our route for the next three days.  He gave me a potted history of Alpine Clubs and how local associations sponsor particular huttes.  Because of the web site I used to plan the route, we were staying in huttes sponsored by local associations from the German Alpine Society - need to do some more work on this as membership makes accommodation really cheap.

Day 4

Theoretically Goppinger Hutte, the Day 4 target, was only 4 hours from Biberache Hutte - a "rest day" after 10 hours on Day 3.  What was becoming apparent, however, was that keeping pace with the Austrian standard hour walking pace was tough, particularly when you were going up hill.  Day 4 involves 880 metres of climb, 480 descent over 12 kms all to be completed in 4 hours.

All the descent was in the first couple of hours, downhill into woods and where tree roots crossed the paths making the going treacherous. At the bottom and across a stream you suddenly had to pull yourself up a twenty foot near vertical face using a steel rope - a sudden change of pace.
Rope assisted climb

Climbing up to Goppinger
After climbing up the Hochschere the day before we had really got our hill climbing act together.  Christine set the pace and we climb really quickly.  After 600 metres we stop for lunch (we bought a "luncheon bucket" picnic from Biberache - enough food for two days) and the views are great.  The last 200 metres climb are through a classic kast landscape with its limestone blocks and crossing lots of patches of snow.  Arrive at the hutte at about 3, it's packed with a large party of Germans, and despite booking a room we have to share.  It was with the German baker and his son who arrive an hour or so after us so not so bad.

The main topic of conversation over dinner was the extent of my navigation/planning skills.  Christine's confidence, stretched by the huge walks on Day 1 and Day 3, was given a further knock when we worked out that I had screwed up for Day 5.  Because I'm a penny pincher, and didn't buy the map needed for a tiny part of the route, my proposed Day 5 schedule was wrong.  The direct route to Ravensburger (4 hours) meant going down the valley and along the road and was not the NW 01 or the E4.  The real route meant going to Frieburger Hutte (4 hours 30) and then to Ravensburger (another 4.30) - 9 hours excluding breaks and given the track record this could be much longer.  Christine, with German back-up, was now questioning the latter parts of the route as well.

Day 5

I think these are Chamois
Holding on
Out of the hutte by 7.30, lovely day, felt great to be walking at that time, and the target was Ravensburger via Frieburger.  After 20 minutes we get our reward for such an early start and saw deer, could be chamois,  grazing on the scree.  The first part of the walk, the Steinmayerweg, was a huge contour route, along high often narrow paths, perched beneath the 2500 metre peaks in the Johanneskopf.  Great walk but amber on the scary scale if Hochschere was red.  Last hour before Freiburger the path was very broken and progress slow but we made the hutte by 12 (220 metres climb, 500 descent) and rewarded ourselves with huge plates of pasta.

The walk in afternoon was one of the best I have ever done.  An initial climb, a long grassy contour was followed by some really tough kast walking.  Stretched out across the limestone blocks was a party of elderly Germans who were really struggling necessitating a helicopter rescue for one of them.  Then the really big climb up to the Aufstieg zum Gehrengrat (2439 metres) - a big climb but through a alpine grassland all the way. After resting at the top, where the alpine grassland ended abruptly with a cliff, the route took us along the ridge and then sharply down into the valley below empty apart from numerous marmots with their distinctive whistle.
Top walk

Despite not getting to the Hutte until about 6.45 we both felt great.  Immediate beer, followed by food, hot shower and in bed by 8.30.  Brilliant day.

Day 6

Christine with friend
Paid for Day 5 a bit on Day 6.  The weather had turned misty and the walk was less inviting.  The target was Stuttgarter Hutte, about 12 kms to the east involving 1100 metres of climb and 720 metres of descent.  Mist all the way and after 2 hours we encountered serious skiing country.  A skier myself it's horrible see the damage done to the landscape when the snow has gone.  The only point on the whole trip when the signs failed to work was at the ski station above Zurs where, after struggling to find the path, we tried to get on the chair lift down the mountain but the maintenance crew, although sympathetic, said no.

Of course cheats never prosper, and if we had got the lift, we would have missed Anthony Gormley's statues which at the moment are staring across the valley halfway down to Zurs.  Zurs itself, once we got there, was awful, an empty ski resort, a ghost town, where, in the summer, you can't even get a coffee.

Sunset at Stuttgarter Hutte
Climbing out of Zurs we had to endure a tarmac road for about an hour (of course I know realise that the route I took although the NW 01 was not the E4 which was on a variant - the variant I think, which didn't go to Stuttgarter, may have been better).  Anyway after a stop at the Trittalpe Hutte and goats milk the weather and the scenery got better. The final 300 metre climb up to Stuttgarter Hutte was tough at the end of the day, but it's a great location and after dinner (wurst and saur kraut) we were treated to a lovely sun-set.

Day 7

Christine's confidence in my navigation had returned only marginally.  We were booked into the Kaiserjochhaus which was theoretically 8 hours away but we had a debate about whether it was too far.  As a fail safe we also booked the Leukircher Hutte which is half way.  We set of at 7.40 in great form, another brilliant morning.  Climbed over the pass (2420 metres) underneath Wilder Kasten  and then down to Erlachealpe (1922 metres) and then up again over a pass at about 2,300 metres.  Some amber path walking high up on the valley coming up from Erlacheaple but after that in the sun in a stunningly beautiful green valley.  Arrived triumphantly at the Leuckircher Hutte at 11.15 and talked to the landlord about a potential world record.  Celebrated with an enormous plate of potatoes and grilled spam - a delicacy in these parts. We were now back on the E4 proper (signed for the first time) and the Alderweg which is clearly a major Austrian long-distance route with a much higher profile than the NW 01. Looks like there has been a lot of investment in this part of the route - new signs, new steel ropes.
Grilled spam and eggs - yes!
The E4 really exists

Final stretch of the walk was a lovely contour walk high above the St Anton valley and nailing the schedule we arrived at Kaiserjochhaus at 3.30.  No single rooms available and the prospect of spending the last night in the mountains in a dormitory is too much.  I am also wearing a T-shirt for the second day and need to keep moving to stay ahead of my own smell.  We decide to drop down to Pettneu.  Found a lovely hotel (hotels are really cheap in the summer) and got cleaned up. 
No dormitories please

Next day bus and train to Zurich meaning that instead of walking we have a city break.

All in all a great holiday, brilliant walk, really helpful test run.  Separate blog on the lessons learnt.

Special thanks to Christine, not known for her patience, she never expressed more than gentle doubts for what were justifiable concerns about the quality of the plan.

Stage 11 - Through the Vercors

Stage 11 looks like the toughest stage yet.  It is 217 km and involves 9,000 metres of climb over 9 days.  After what is essentially a linking day from Chateauneuf-du-Rhone to Dieulefet along the GR 429 the E4 heads north along the GR9 all the way to the Swiss border.

The toughness of the walk is a reflection, in part at least, of the change in geology.  The younger mountains on the eastern side of the Rhone valley are different to the ancients on the west and the foothills of Alps and Jura come with deeper valleys, tougher ascents and descents than the Massif Central.

From Leoncel onwards the walk takes you through the Vercors Natural Park .  The landscape has been described as a limestone "citadel" which dramatic cliffs and long gorges.  It actually was a citadel against the Germans in the 2nd World War with the Resistance provoking a bloody response from paratroopers landing on mass in the area in gliders.

Day  1, probably after a rest day at Chateauneuf-du-Rhone, is a really long one, 39 kms.  Can't find any accommodation on the route and it will be nice to get onto the GR9.  Highlight of the walk, which is through fairly gentle, wooded countryside, is probably the 10th century abbey at Aiguebelle.  Dieulefet, an ancient pottery centre, looks like a nice town and has plenty of accommodation.

Dieulefit
It might be possible to walk all the way to Saillans on day 2 (33 kms, 1500 metres) but after such a tough day 1 that looks like a stretch.  The alternative is a short walk to the small village of  village of Bourdeaux,  (13 kms) leaving Saillans for day 3.

Day 3 looks like a dramatic walk, 20 kms, 1200 metres of climb and 1300 of descent before arriving at Saillons.  The climb involves ascending the Massif de Saou and the potential views from the top could be amazing with huge cliffs dropping north and east into what looks like a gorge below.  It looks like a very steep descent into the small town/village of Saillons.
Massif de Saou
Day 4 is a 20 km walk to Plan-de-Baix, 1068 metres of climb and 551 metres of descent.  Most of the climbing is at the end of the day and after you have gone through the village of Beaufort sur Gevanne.  Plan-de-Baix is a small village but it looks it has a family activity centre (as well as a Gite D'Etape) so there should be some accommodation. 

Most of the climbing has been done on day 4, so day 5 is 28 kms of fairly high level walking, a climb near the end near the Col de Tournoile, and then a steep descent to Bouvantes-le-Bas where there is accommodation.  On the way you go through  Leoncel, a small village with a Cistercine Abbey.  

The walk is now tracking along the western side of the Vercors Natural Park and the last four days of the walk look particularly dramatic.  The day of the four (day 6) starts with a hard climb out of Saint-Martin de Colonel up to 1300 metres, over the Col-de-la-Machine, along a ridge walk with potentially great views to both the east and west, before a really steep drop down to Pont en Royan.  This is a 25 km walk with 1200 metres of climb - something around an 11 hour day.

Pont en Royan is a famous beauty spot, a medieval village where houses are built into a cliff and suspended over a river - would be a good place to stop but I should in Grenoble in two days time so will probably press.  Pont en Royan is also the gateway to what looks like the most dramatic part of this stage, the Massif des Coulmes. 
Pont en Royan

Day 7 is a 22 km walk but mainly uphill.  Walking firstly up along the Bourne Gorge and up its side along what must be a steep path you get to the top at around 1300 metres.  The scenery should be dramatic.  Having won the height the hard way you then loose 500 metres dropping down to the small village of Rencurel which has accommodation and is the target for the day.

Day 8 is another day with a lot of climb.  An initial 500 metre climb and a small descent takes you past the small ski resort of Autrans.  After 25 kms in total and some 1,500 metres of climb you arrive at the Refuge at La Sure

After three tough days the last day involves a march, mainly down hill, into Grenoble.  16 kms, 500 metres of climb, 1700 descent, so should be there for lunch.  Grenoble will be a good place to stop and recuperate.

I packed my bag and in I put..... (4)

I think I might have suggested, in my last "pack my bag" blog  that Chris Townsend's reference to bare foot walking was a bit mad - shows how much I know.  It turns out that just because I didn't know about bare foot walking doesn't mean it didn't exist and that in fact bare foot running at least is very  popular.  Essentially, so the argument goes, if you don't wear shoes (with heals) you adopt a better gait which involves using your whole foot as suspension.  This in turn strengthens your foot and is actually the "natural" thing.  Makes sense to me.

Anyway bear foot running shoes are not the contradiction in terms they sound and are designed to stop you stabbing yourself on nasty surfaces while retaining the natural suspension of your foot.  Some really weird looking shoes have been developed as a consequence and Vibram (lots of walking boots use their soles) are one of the  suppliers.  Their five finger is a classic example of a weird looking shoe and has become so popular that fake Vibram five finger shoes are a real problem.

Of course running shoes don't bear directly on the issue of walking boots and the sort of footwear I need for the E4.  It is however becoming increasingly apparent that more walkers are looking for running rather than hiking based solutions, abandoning even modern "Scarpa" walking boots along the way.  A good example is Alastair Humphreys who walked in running shoes on his 965 km trek up the Kaveri River in India.

Roclite 390 GTX
Running shoes also take me back over 25 years when a party of us were led up Ben Nevis the hard way by a local guide, a fell runner, who wore his trainers.  Taking us down again, and nearly at the bottom, he met his father going out for a run, left us to join him and ran with him back to the top of Ben Nevis.  Ruined our day!

Thanks to Lone Walkers comments on my last blog I have now discovered Inov8.  Inov8, as the name suggests, is at the leading edge of footwear design, adopt some bare foot principles, and have developed a walking boot from a fell-running back ground.  Hard to get their boots at the standard hiking shops but they have agreed to send me a pair of their Roclite 390 GTX to try them out prior to potentially using them on the E4 walk.  Can't wait to try them out.